Capital Reviews per Reviewer – Admin
By Reviewer ecreal on February 8, 2019 at 4:05 PM
(Only one Project Type should have scores.)
|4: Good||4: Good||4: Good||4: Good|
|Impact||Priorities||Existing System||Economic Development||Collaboration|
This request provides no information on the acutal cost savings of replacing the boiler vs. repairing the existing, no information on the issues Facilities Maintenance has encountered, no information on the number of people who work in City Hall and visit the building on a daily basis who would be impacted by a boiler failure; it lacks sufficient information to score highly. Information on the type and efficiencies that might be received from a newer type of boiler would have provided additional scoring benefit.